Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Forums @ TESOLTeachers.org
News:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 14, 2010, 10:40:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Modules


Recent
[March 12, 2010, 11:53:07 PM]

[December 22, 2009, 07:34:56 PM]

[December 22, 2009, 07:32:55 PM]

[December 22, 2009, 07:32:18 PM]

[July 21, 2009, 04:44:33 PM]
Members
Total Members: 131
Latest: eric2010
Stats
Total Posts: 1293
Total Topics: 1094
Online Today: 4
Online Ever: 53
(February 11, 2009, 07:09:49 AM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 5
Total: 5

Our Counter
There have been
Visitors since January 2005


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Article: Forget how the crow flies  (Read 1514 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Guest
Guest
« on: January 28, 2004, 12:29:20 PM »

Hi Greg...In response to my ideas about Word Surfing and the
advantages of keeping "organised vocabulary books", you commented
"Sounds interesting. Is it the language learner as a little linguist,
or philologist?"

Well, actually,it's just a very practical idea that provides
learners with an effective long-term vocabulary (language) expansion
strategy/game.

If you have any other specific questions about the method itself
(or the reasons behind it's development)...please ask - and I'll be
happy to reply.

Best Wishes etc
Will
http://www.wordsurfing.co.uk



 Sent by Forums@TESOLTeachers.org (http://TESOLTeachers.org)
Logged
Guest
Guest
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2004, 03:59:17 AM »

Hi, my comments about the crows path - in relation to doubts about
the efficiency and enjoyment of language methodology led Greg to
reply
 
"Sounds like Zen in the Art of Second Language Learning wink" .....

....but surely it's plain simple common sense, not Zen Wink , that
tells us that as more words can be used in a meaningful manner, the
easier it becomes to communicate effectively.

The vocabulary (language) development process tends to start with
people feeling the need to write down some essential foreign words
(and phrases) together with their translations - before trying to
remember them. A lot can be said in favour of this initial approach.
It’s a logical method that leads to a quick understanding of a few
essential words and phrases. More importantly, it almost always
encourages learners to build on their initial successes.

However, despite achieving some early progress, this very narrow and
shallow approach to language acquisition soon becomes less
effective. Learners, understandably, often abandon the idea of
keeping such basic vocabulary notebooks after a short while. They
soon realise that vocabulary (language) expansion goes way beyond
any mechanical ability to reproduce single translations from memory.

“Word Surfing” (WS) was created to overcome the weaknesses of this
traditional, short-term approach to vocabulary learning … and
replace it with a much more practically useful, long-term vocabulary
development strategy. It’s design transforms a standard vocabulary
notebook into one that gives learners the ability to move away from
translations, and that encourages them to actually start using their
chosen new words as soon as possible. A wider-ranging, motivating
and active strategy can then start to develop at a time when
learning by translation becomes inefficient or even counter-
productive.

Organisation, learner independence and motivation are central to the
WS Concept, which is designed to appeal to those with a positive
desire to improve their language skills. The modern world certainly
offers plenty of opportunity to speakers of more than one language
and the incentive to develop multi-lingual skills has probably never
been greater. Only fifty years ago most people didn’t have the
chance to travel much and the vast majority of conversations could
only be with people who spoke “their language”. Opportunities to
learn a newlanguage …and work abroad - were very limited at that
time when compared to today. There was a much smaller pool of
available language teachers and a far smaller selection of good
resources. The incentive to learn a foreign language at that time
was understandably low for a lot of people.

Language teachers, faced with such circumstances, might well have
felt the need to follow highly structured " crow-like" courses that
fed students with a large spoon - full of something that might not
really appeal to their own individual taste buds. It’s also
understandable that so much time has traditionally been devoted to
early L1 explanations of L2 grammar structures. After all, the
method of emphasising early teaching and testing of grammar usually
produces (almost) acceptable and (reasonably) rapid results.

However, most teachers and students are now presented with a far
better set of circumstances. More and more language students, even
the relatively poor, have real opportunities to travel and work in
different parts of the world. Those who want to stay at home often
have the chance to communicate with others in different languages on
the internet. A much larger pool of capable teachers together with a
huge number of excellent resources are available to them. Nowadays
the incentive to learn a foreign language is understandably a lot
higher for a lot of people.

Under these circumstances, traditional methodology can develop into
something more flexible, meaningful and motivating. Word Surfing is
an additional resource that can complement expanding learning
opportunities and help learners to improve more independently
outside the classroom.....

...and hopefully enjoy flying a bit faster than the crow.

Will McCulloch

Vocabulary Developer
http://www.wordsurfing.co.uk
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/wordsurfing/





 Sent by Forums@TESOLTeachers.org (http://TESOLTeachers.org)
Logged
Guest
Guest
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2004, 12:11:43 PM »

Yes! I'd definitely tend to go along with this - and see it as very
relevant to language methodology and outcomes, particularly
concerning the heavy early emphasis on "direct" grammar
teaching/testing that is normally imposed - (with the best of
intentions, of course)- and the "fossilization" issue.

It's strange how much effort L2 learners are currently encouraged to
put into having correct grammar early on.....and how many errors
remain rooted within them later on. Isn't it?

On the other hand....those who are motivated to approach the
language learning process by immersing themselves in it asap, seem
to benefit greatly from simply exploring it - especially when this
is done through exposure to appropriate graded reading/listening
combined with a vocabulary development strategy. Such learners tend
to develop the habit of repeating what is correct by imitating
correct sounds, copying correct words and sentences - and gradually
creating language themselves...(just like L1 children).

By concentrating more on vocabulary expansion/understanding during
the early stages of the learning curve, such learners can experience
a lot of positive, motivating progress - and naturally pick up
plenty of good habits along the way. They also avoid the negativity
of being shown that they are repeatedly wrong in tests that they
aren't fully prepared for...(mainly due to a general lack of
familiarity with all the words involved).

The benefits of early exposure to errors through a lot of testing
needs, I feel, to be seriously questionned in terms of efficiency,
enjoyment and motivation. Most early grammar testing shows very
little apart from short-term appreciation(or otherwise) of some
structure (rather than language itself).

Going down too many grammar roads too quickly is a dangerous, long
and tiresome route for many learners to take. They may get a
shallow "understanding" of a verb tense (for example) in the short
term.......but with this "direct" approach it is very
often "necessary" to re-teach and re-test the same tense (and many
other topics) again ( and again!) later due to repeated errors.
Furthermore, the students, at this stage, are generally less than
enthusiastic about re-learning grammar....and almost always
impatient to expand their real communication skills (with their
still frustratingly limited vocabulary and understanding).

It's now a poor set of circumstances from which to progress to
perfection.

So why not focus more on vocabulary expansion/understanding during
the early phases of the learning curve? Fine tuning of grammatical
errors could then be made at a stage where far more naturally
competent communicators were in a much better position ( as with L1
learners) to quickly and efficiently benefit from direct grammar
instruction and testing.

If we want to in the direction of good grammar habits - the quickest
and safest route might just be to stay away from the crow's path -
until we've learned how to fly a bit in a language.

Will McCulloch

Vocabulary Developer
http://www.wordsurfing.co.uk
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/wordsurfing/


--- In HwakangJournal@yahoogroups.com, <KenDickson98@h...> wrote:
> Forget how the crow flies
> By John Kay
> Published: January 16 2004 18:50 | Last Updated: January 16 2004
18:50
>
>
> If you want to go in one direction, the best route may involve
going in the other. Paradoxical as it sounds, goals are more likely
to be achieved when pursued indirectly. So the most profitable
companies are not the most profit-oriented, and the happiest people
are not those who make happiness their main aim. The name of this
idea? Obliquity
>
> http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1073281059044&p=10125
71727132
>
> Kenneth J. Dickson
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Chinese Culture University
> Taipei, Taiwan
> http://www.geocities.com/KenDickson2000
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.564 / Virus Database: 356 - Release Date: 1/19/04
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Sent by Forums@TESOLTeachers.org (http://TESOLTeachers.org)
Logged
Guest
Guest
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2004, 09:12:10 AM »

Forget how the crow flies
By John Kay
Published: January 16 2004 18:50 | Last Updated: January 16 2004 18:50


If you want to go in one direction, the best route may involve going in the other. Paradoxical as it sounds, goals are more likely to be achieved when pursued indirectly. So the most profitable companies are not the most profit-oriented, and the happiest people are not those who make happiness their main aim. The name of this idea? Obliquity

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1073281059044&p=1012571727132

Kenneth J. Dickson
---------------------------------------------------------------
Chinese Culture University
Taipei, Taiwan
http://www.geocities.com/KenDickson2000
---------------------------------------------------------------


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.564 / Virus Database: 356 - Release Date: 1/19/04

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Sent by Forums@TESOLTeachers.org (http://TESOLTeachers.org)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media
TinyPortal v0.8.6 Bloc | XHTML | CSS | Aero79 design by Bloc